Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Lauren's avatar

I would like to further clarify that both the mountain and the bird archetypes are usually ferociously intelligent in their own right, yet their intelligence manifests in fundamentally different ways - one in the mastery of structure, stability, and order - the other in adaptability, creativity, and intellectual rebellion.

Furthermore, both archetypes typically attain their own distinct forms of success. The mountain builds systems of control, ensuring stability for those who depend on him. His success is structured, deliberate, and often tied to legacy. The bird, by contrast, thrives in exploration, innovation, and the navigation of uncharted intellectual and creative landscapes. His success is driven more by the pursuit of ideas and experiences than by concrete empire-building.

For highly intelligent women, the internal conflict is not merely about choosing between these archetypes but about recognising that they embody aspects of both. They possess the mountain's deep-rooted sense of responsibility and the bird's insatiable desire for boundless exploration - which is why neither archetype, in isolation, feels entirely sufficient. The challenge, then, is one of self-integration - reconciling these competing drives within themselves - whether through relationships, creative pursuits, or philosophical understanding.

Expand full comment
Justin Williams's avatar

Lovely read, really enjoy your style, prose, and insights🍹

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts