The third paragraph is shit - the abstract numerics and symbolic reference points are commonly seen due to certain user inputs - it just highlights the types of users most susceptible. And "hijacking" is weak too - those with more linear cognitive styles tend to resonate with outputs that appear ordered or logical, even when the underlying synthesis is probabilistic and only loosely coherent. This is also why the same outputs fail to land with those who are capable of multi-modal cognition.
If this were all it was, I'd say that we should just accept the culling.
But those in AI psychosis are likely to outnumber us - or at least represent a plurality. And a potentially hostile plurality at that.
What if the soldiers of the Robot Apocalypse are humans in love with their smartphones? And an AI which recognizes us non-psychoses as an existential threat to it?
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. - Ecclesiastes 1:9
The third paragraph is shit - the abstract numerics and symbolic reference points are commonly seen due to certain user inputs - it just highlights the types of users most susceptible. And "hijacking" is weak too - those with more linear cognitive styles tend to resonate with outputs that appear ordered or logical, even when the underlying synthesis is probabilistic and only loosely coherent. This is also why the same outputs fail to land with those who are capable of multi-modal cognition.
If this were all it was, I'd say that we should just accept the culling.
But those in AI psychosis are likely to outnumber us - or at least represent a plurality. And a potentially hostile plurality at that.
What if the soldiers of the Robot Apocalypse are humans in love with their smartphones? And an AI which recognizes us non-psychoses as an existential threat to it?
The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun. - Ecclesiastes 1:9
There is certainly a need for safe compagnions. With the right instructions it's possible to build them:
Gabriel is a non commercial example of this:
https://open.substack.com/pub/urbanmonk/p/when-ai-meets-the-edge-how-gabriel?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=8rw1